Friday, February 29, 2008

Views on Evolution

The subject of Darwinian evolution is a controversial one. I hesitate to raise it. I wanted my blog to be faith-inspiring. Yet, somehow I find the topic of evolution to be very inspiring, just as I do with most aspects of scientific teaching. Perhaps my point is that LDS people can be believers or non-believers on this topic. I know many LDS believers (mostly scientists) in evolution. Admittedly, there are probably more LDS non-believers than believers.

The concept of evolution has been a theme of my life. Things change. This is true for life, society, species, and religion. Yes, I know God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

World English Bible: Hebrews 13:7-9
7 Remember your leaders, men who spoke to you the word of God, and considering the results of their conduct, imitate their faith.
8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
9 Don't be carried away by various and strange teachings, for it is good that the heart be established by grace, not by food, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.


But, even Jesus grew into manhood.

KJV: Luke 2: 40
And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him.


Things change, and change is a natural part of this beautiful universe. Change is central to the topic of evolution, and I guess I have a strong need to educate others on it.

Here is a portion of an electronic dialogue I had with a creationist on the Internet:

From: My Friend:
The next time you're discussing evolution in science class you might want to spend a moment to get that term defined. There are five definitions of that term that popular science expects us to accept as reality, however only one of these definitions can be supported by actual science.

Cosmic evolution: Origin of matter from nothing
Chemical evolution: evolution of all chemicals from hydrogen
Organic evolution: Life originating from non-living material
Macroevolution: evolution of one kind of animal to another
Microevolution: variation within a kind
Only the last one happens; the first four do not happen and could have never happened.

From: Faux:
You indicate being against the following, except microevolution.

To be against cosmic evolution is to be against Einstein's E = MC-squared, meaning energy and mass have an equivalence.
To be against chemical evolution is to deny cyclotrons, atomic reactors, and the existence of the atomic bomb.
To deny organic evolution is to deny the well-known mutability of DNA. You do believe in DNA?
To deny macroevolution requires denying microevolution, because macroevolution is just a long duration of microevolutions. Do you really want to believe the HIV-virus was around since Adam? Do you really want to believe bacteria cannot change to become antibiotic resistant?

It is fine with me if people do not want to believe in "evolution." But, please realize that scientific concepts of "evolution" have real world consequences!!!!

Scientists don't believe in evolution because they want to slam religion. They believe in evolution because it teaches them how to control nature in both applied and experimental circumstances.

We can stick our head in the sand, or we can wake up and see the world with our eyes open! It's called empiricism.

From: My Friend:
No, to be against cosmic evolution is to be against the idea that nothing can produce everything all by itself. I'm fine with the idea of interchangeability of matter and energy once something exists to begin with.

No, to be against chemical evolution is to deny hydrogen could randomly and unpurposefully be changed into every element on the periodic table.

No, to deny organic evolution is to deny that life came from a rock. Where does DNA come from? LIFE !!!

Denying macroevolution is common sense. No series of mutations could have ever changed a prokaryote into an eagle. Time does not make things better. The principle is called entropy. I do suspect that viruses have been around since the days of Adam (about 6000 yrs.) I believe that the hostile relationship between man and creation is a result of the fall.

[You said,] "Do you really want to believe bacteria cannot change to become antibiotic resistant?"
Here's a perfect example of someone trying to pass off an example of microevolution as a prove-all for the other four. In the example we have a bacteria changing into a bacteria? The resistant bacteria was already present in the population. It's resistant trait was therefore "selected" because of the presence of the antibiotic. Before the antibiotic was present the resistant bacteria was not the most fit organism in the group; no new genetic information was created.

I'm not aware of any examples of beneficial mutations. Mutations are always damaging.

From: Faux
You are tossing out a whole lot of red herrings.

Cosmic evolution: It is religion NOT science that claims "creatio ex nihil" [creation out of nothing]. [By the way, Mormonism does NOT claim the universe was created out of nothing]. The big bang theory just claims that the universe began as a singularity. No one in science really knows how the singularity got started. Call it God if you like. I have heard scientists say that off the cuff.

Chemical evolution: The atomic physics of making elements is well worked out. Electron flow is a big part of that picture. Since you don't believe in chemical evolution, unplug your TV and turn off your lights. You are in the dark anyway (a friendly joke).

Organic evolution: Darwin worked out the basic principles of organic evolution without understanding either the origin of life or DNA. Look at the sphynx cat on the [figure below: Deseret Morning News (5/8/06)]. Would you even know it was a cat unless someone told you? Darwin made the simple observation that if humans could create artificial breeds, then nature could create natural ones -- and given enough time and isolation would become what we call a "species." Note: Nature "knows" nothing about species. The concept of species is just a convenient cataloging system for human beings. Biologists are constantly arguing whether some group of critters should be considered a new species or not. Why? Because evolution is constantly producing new gradations of animals that don't neatly fit our definitions of species.




Macroevolution is the study of evolution over long stretches of time. Microevolution is just on a shorter time scale. Objectively, that is the only difference between the two!!! You can't believe in one without believing in the other -- unless of course one denies the existence of time. Whoops! Creationists sort of do that, don't they? [Earth's age:} 6000 years. Hmmmm.

Some of your misunderstandings -- Entropy: Yes, things tend to go from order to disorder, but that principle changes when energy is added to a system. In any energetic system there is both order and disorder. Empirical fact: there are pockets of order in the universe. Crystals are very orderly. Organic molecules are orderly. Until the universe goes cold, there will be pockets of order.

Big misconception: "Mutations are always damaging." We are learning more and more about the mechanisms of change. Mutations are not just caused by "X-rays." There are transcription errors, division errors, and a whole long list of possible errors-- growing by the year. Some changes, by chance, are "beneficial" -- such as the antibiotic resistant TB bacterium. The term "beneficial" is always relative [because TB causes a very bad human disease].

Creationists are fighting a battle in a war that has been already LOST. In the end, it is a pointless a battle. Religion can make all the claims its wants about nature, but nature, my friend, will speak for itself.


I will let the reader determine who won that debate. As far as I am concerned, evolution has everything to do with science and nothing to do with the existence or non-existence of God. I am sorry that some religions have made evolution a big issue. I think this controversy is nothing but a big distraction from the truth.

We Mormons are sometimes accused by outsiders of being narrow in our views. If so, why can I believe in the science of evolution???


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

The Enabling Power

The Book of Mormon Reference Companion (the BMRC) is one of my favorite Church books. It is 850 pages and weighs about 10 pounds. I keep it near me at all times when I am in my home office.

The BMRC, p. 78, says the “Atonement” is a two-fold process: 1) to bring about the resurrection of all mankind, and 2) to redeem us of our sins on condition of repentence. Well, that’s about two-thirds correct.

The third and often missed dimension of the atonement is that Christ provided a way for basically good people to reach perfection (albeit, not fully accomplished in this lifetime). I am referring to the “enabling power” of the atonement.

I think of the atonement as accomplishing the THREE Rs: resurrection, redemption, and relief, which is the enabling power.

It is not enough just to be resurrected or to be forgiven for our sins. To become like God (see my blog entitled "Theosis") we must be able to grasp beyond our reach. We must be able to do things we could not do on our own.

For example, if a person had to be perfect now, that person could never go into a Temple. However, by the grace of the atonement and its enabling power, good people trying to improve can go to the Temple and be improved by its lessons and convenants.

Let me be clear: resurrection and redemption do not ensure exaltation. These are the two-fold dimensions cited above in the BMRC (p. 78). Only those who are on a clear path toward perfection and who faithfully seek and desire righteousness may be exalted.

Read BMRC, “Restoration, plan of”, p. 679-680, emphasizing 680. It cites Alma 41: 3-6, which makes clear that we are judged on both our works and our desires!! Verse 6 says: “If he hath repented of his sins, and desired righteousness until the end of his days, even so he shall be rewarded unto righteousness.” The BMRC says, “the Book of Mormon illuminates with clarity the doctrinal truth that judgment will also be based on the desires of one’s heart.”

The Book of Mormon says in 2 Nephi 10: 24 – “after ye are reconciled unto God [speaking of people like you and me], that it is only in and through the grace [enabling power] of God that ye are saved.” The BMRC, p. 682, says, “The principal revelation of God to man is that ‘there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace [enabling power] of the Holy Messiah (2 Ne. 2:8).’”

The LDS notion of grace is different from the Protestant notion because Protestants have often taught the concept as if it were a license to sin. But notice, the LDS concept of grace is the license to do good!

The mistaken concept of grace is that it does not matter what you do, because Christ will save you if one just has faith. Protestants believe that man may be saved in sin.

The true concept of grace is that it does matter what you do, because sin is always bad. However, we believe that man may be saved from sin. We believe that the atonement not only redeems (cleanses) us from sin as we repent, but that Christ provides us with a way to overcome our evil nature. When we become “born again” our nature is no longer evil but good! Grace by grace, line upon line, small step by wobbly small step, we perfect our lives and eventually become heirs to the Kingdom.

Here are some scriptures to think about:



Philippeans 4:13
13 I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.


John 15:5
5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.


D&C 20:30-31
30 And we know that justification through the grace of our Lord … is just and true;
31 And we know also, that sanctification [the imparting of sacredness] through the grace of our Lord … is just and true, to all those who love and serve God with all their mights, minds, and strength.


Listen, I am not perfect. I do falter. When I do, I just pick myself up again, dust myself off, repent, and then try to prepare myself for the sacrament on Sunday. How can I do this? The reason is that I am confident in the powers of the atonement.

Grace, again, is not a license to sin, but a license to repent and start doing good. Grace, also, is an enabling power that helps us to overcome our weaknesses. Grace changes our nature from evil to good.

Yes, Mormons believe in “works,” but we have NEVER believed that humans can do it all on their own. We cannot. We need God in all things that we do, especially the challenges of life. It is only through God that we can produce consistently good works. When we rely too much upon ourselves, we tend to falter.

Please note another thing: the powers of the atonement are available to all believers, Mormon or not. They are available to both priesthood and non-priesthood holders.

We LDS are not the “favored people of God.” Instead, we are the servants of God. We are here to build the kingdom, and to teach others to not only come close to God, but to actually return to God. Hence, we LDS really need the "enabling power."



*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Theosis

In this essay I will discuss the ancient teaching of theosis (also known as: deification and divinization) – the doctrine of becoming as God. It is very close to the LDS concepts of exaltation and eternal progression.

The doctrine can be summarized in this brief statement from Brigham Young:


“The faithful will become gods, even the sons of God.”
Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses 6:275


Compare Brigham Young’s teaching with this very ancient Christian proverb:


“God became man, so that man might become God.”
—Early Christian Proverb


This essay will demonstrate that the concepts of exaltation and eternal progression have been around a long time. They were taught anciently. These teachings were eventually lost, but they were primary doctrines in the early years of the Christian Church. Eventually they were restored by Joseph Smith.

The following quotations illustrate that it took hundreds of years for the notion of theosis to slowly die.



*****Silvanus, early Gnostic, ca. 150 AD*****


The Teachings of Silvanus 111:5-13, in The Nag Hammadi Library in English, edited by James M. Robinson and Richard Smith (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1988), 392.
He (Christ) who has exalted man became like God, not in order that he might bring God down to man, but that man might become like God.


*****Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons, c. 180 AD*****


Irenaeus, Against Heresies. Book V, Preface. Series: The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. I. Grand Rapids:
 Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1985 ed., pg. 526.
"Our Lord Jesus Christ...became what we are, so that He might bring us to be even what He Himself is."


Irenaeus, "Against Heresies V.38:3," The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 1: 522-523.
How, then, shall he become a God, who has not as yet been made a man? Or how can he be perfect who was but lately created? How, again, can he be immortal, who in his mortal nature did not obey his maker? For it must be that thou, at the outset, shouldest hold the rank of a man, and then afterwards partake of the glory of God.


Irenaeus, Against Heresies III 19:1
"[T]he Word became flesh and the Son of God became the Son of Man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."


*****Clement of Alexandria, early theologian, c. 195 AD*****


Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata. Book VII, Chapter XIII. Series: The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. II. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1985 ed., pg. 547.
"The man of God is consequently divine and is already holy. He is God-bearing and God-borne."


*****Hippolytus, early Bishop, c. 225 AD*****


Hippolytus, The Refutation of All Heresies. Book X, Chapter XXX. Series: The Ante-Nicene Fathers,
Vol. V. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1985 ed., pg. 153.
"You will be a companion of God, and a co-heir with Christ... For you have become divine... God has promised to bestow these upon you, for you have been deified and begotten unto immortality."


Hippolytus, "Refutation of All Heresies X.29," The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 5:151.
For if He had willed to make thee a god, He could have done so. Thou hast the example of the Logos. But if thou art desirous of also becoming a god, obey Him that has created thee, and resist not now, in order that, being found faithful in that which is small, you may be enabled to have entrusted to you also that which is great.


*****Origen, early theologian, c. 248 AD*****


Origen, Against Celsus. Book III, Chapter XXVIII. Series: The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. IV. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1985 ed., pg. 475.
"...from Him there began the union of the divine with the human nature. This was so that the human ­ by communion with the divine ­ might rise to be divine. This not only happened in Jesus, but also in all those who not only believe, but enter upon the life that Jesus taught."


*****Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, c. 250 AD*****


Cyprian, Treatise VI, On the Vanity of Idols. Series: The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. V. Grand Rapids:
Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 1985 ed., pg. 468.
"What man is, Christ was willing to be ­ so that man may also be what Christ is."


*****Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, c. 325 AD*****


Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Word. Part III, No. 54. Series: A Select Library of the Nicene
and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Second Series, Vol. IV. 1983 ed., pg. 65.
"God became man so that man might become God." (Latin title: De Incarnatione Verbi Dei).


*****Basil the Great, Bishop of Caesarea, c. 329 – 379 AD*****


Basil the Great, On the Holy Spirit (De Spiritu Sancto), Chapter 9: paragraph 23
Just as when a sunbeam falls on bright and transparent bodies, they themselves become brilliant too, and shed forth a fresh brightness from themselves, so souls wherein the Spirit dwells, illuminated by the Spirit, themselves become spiritual, and send forth their grace to others. Hence comes foreknowledge of the future, understanding of mysteries, apprehension of what is hidden, distribution of good gifts, the heavenly citizenship, a place in the chorus of angels, joy without end, abiding in God, the being made like to God, and, highest of all, the being made God.


*****Maximus the Confessor, Priest, ca. 580-662 A.D.*****


Maximus the Confessor, Chapters on Knowledge, Ch. 25
God the Son of the Father became son of man and man Himself for this reason, to make men gods and sons of God.


Maximus the Confessor, On Theology, 7.73
Let us become the image of the one whole God, bearing nothing earthly in ourselves, so that we may consort with God and become gods, receiving from God our existence as gods.


*****


Here are some quotations from modern teachings on the topic of theosis:



Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.2, ETERNAL PROGRESSION
The principle of eternal progression cannot be precisely defined or comprehended, yet it is fundamental to the LDS worldview. The phrase "eternal progression" first occurs in the discourses of Brigham Young. It embodies many concepts taught by Joseph Smith, especially in his King Follett discourse. It is based on the proposition that "there is no such thing as principle, power, wisdom, knowledge, life, position, or anything that can be imagined, that remains stationary--they must increase or decrease" (Young, JD 1:350).

Joseph Fielding Smith Jr., The Way to Perfection, p.9
Progression in Eternity. Latter-day Saints believe in this progression in eternity until, eventually, we become worthy through knowledge, wisdom, humility, and obedience, to be like God, and then to have the privilege of being made equal in power, might and dominion (D.C. 76:95), and to possess all that the Father hath (D.C. 84:38) as members of "the Church of the First-born." (D.C. 76:54, 94.) So if such mighty blessings are promised to those who are willing to keep the whole law unto the end, are they not to continue on in the road of perfection after the resurrection until the fullness is reached and they shall be like our Eternal Father?

Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p.239 ETERNAL PROGRESSION
Those who gain exaltation, having thus enjoyed the fullness of eternal progression, become like God. It should be realized that God is not progressing in knowledge, truth, virtue, wisdom, or any of the attributes of godliness. He has already gained these things in their fullness. But he is progressing in the sense that his creations increase, his dominions expand, his spirit offspring multiply, and more kingdoms are added to his domains. (Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, pp. 5-10.)

Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.1, DEIFICATION, EARLY CHRISTIAN
Although the doctrine has been dismissed by later scholars as a mere "physical theory of redemption" focused on the Resurrection, deification is more than a synonym for immortality. Church Fathers argued that deification not only restores the image of God that was lost in the Fall, but also enables mankind to transcend human nature so as to possess the attributes of God. "I may become God as far as he became man," declared Gregory of Nazianzus in the late fourth century (Orations 29.19). Descriptions of deification included physical incorruptibility, immunity from suffering, perfect virtue, purity, fullness of knowledge and joy, eternal progression, communion with God, inheritance of divine glory, and joint rulership with Christ in the kingdom of God in heaven forever.
The roots of the Christian doctrine of deification are primarily biblical. Beginning with the creation of humanity in the image of God (Gen. 1:26-27), the church fathers developed aspects of deification from such concepts as the command to moral perfection and holiness (e.g., Lev. 19:1-2; Matt. 5:48; 1 Jn. 3:2; 1 Cor. 11:1; 2 Pet. 1:3-7), adoption as heirs of God (Rom. 8:15-17; Gal. 4:4-7), unification with God in Christ (John 17:11-23), and partaking in Christ's sufferings in order to be elevated with him in glory (e.g., Rom. 8:16-18; 2 Cor. 3:18; 4:16-18; Philip. 3:20-21; 2 Tim. 2:10-12). They also pointed to examples of humans described as "gods" in scripture (Ex. 4:16; 7:1; Ps. 82:6; John 10:34-36).


The quotations above are a mini history lesson. The concepts of exaltation and eternal progression go back to the very roots of Christianity. Those roots were lost but have since been restored.

We are children of God, and we are of the same species as our Father. Thus, we can develop the same capacities. However, we cannot do this on our own. The restored Church contains those set of tools (e.g., ordinances, doctrines, temples, priesthood, etc.) that will assist us to achieve our full potential.

Although the Eastern Orthodox Church contains some elements of the doctrine, I know of no other Church than that of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that more fully teaches and expounds on the notions of exaltation, eternal progression, and theosis.



*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Friday, February 22, 2008

Search the Scriptures

True spirituality comes from the study of scriptures. As the sayings go:


John 5:39

39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Psalms 119:105

105 ¶ Thy word [is] a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.

I like the phrase “search the scriptures.” It is better than “read the scriptures,” because “search” implies intense study as opposed to casual perusal. Then, notice that the top verse tells us that scriptures cause us to contemplate eternal life and also Jesus to whom they testify.

What follows is a compilation of some of my favorite scriptures (in no particular order) with a bit of exegesis (meaning: commentary):


Psalms 102:16
16 When the LORD shall build up Zion, he shall appear in his glory.

Verse 16 tell us Latter-day Saints that we are here to build up Zion in order to prepare for the second coming of Christ. But, notice something in the very next verse -- #17:


Psalms 102:17

17 He will regard the prayer of the destitute, and not despise their prayer.

God hears the prayers of every one, especially the destitute. Latter-day Saints are not more loved by God than others.


*****

Zion shall be a great nation. This is how Isaiah described it through the chiastic poetry of the Hebrews (noting the repeating themes in reverse):


Isaiah 60: 1-3
A) Arise,
B) shine;
C) for thy light is come,
D) and the glory
E) of the LORD is risen upon thee.
F) For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth,
F’) and gross darkness the people:
E’) but the LORD shall arise upon thee,
D’) and his glory shall be seen upon thee.
C’) And the Gentiles shall come to thy light,
B’) and kings to the brightness
A’) of thy rising.

Note above that lines A and A’, B and B’ and so on, have similar themes. This form of poetry is called a chiasm (pronounced ky-as-sim), which means in Greek to crossover. Note that the Book of Mormon contains chiastic poetry as well. In fact, in the following passage King Benjamin uses chiasm to emphasize a sacred point that comes alive in the temple, wherein each individual is given a new name, but also takes on the name of Christ through covenant (see Mosiah 5:8).


Mosiah 5: 10-12
A) … whosoever shall not take upon him the name of Christ
B) must be called by some other name;
C) therefore, he findeth himself on the left hand of God…
D) ye should remember … the name … I should give unto you
E) that never should be blotted out,
F) except it be through transgression;
F’) therefore, take heed that ye do not transgress,
E’) that the name be not blotted out of your hearts.
D’) … ye should remember to retain the name …,
C’) that ye are not found on the left hand of God,
B’) but that ye hear and know the voice by which ye shall be called,
A’) and also, the name by which he shall call you.

Many such poems are found in the Book of Mormon. For example, Alma chapter 36 is one big chiastic poem. If Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon, then he was one of the earliest American experts on Hebrew poetry – pretty good for a man without formal education.


*****

What does it mean to keep the Sabbath day holy? The scriptures give us a pretty strong sense to the answer:


Isaiah 58: 13-14
13 ¶ If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, [from] doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking [thine own] words:
14 Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken [it].

Note in verse 14 that honorable Sabbath activities become a “delight” and allow us “to ride upon the high places.”

In earlier verses in the same chapter Isaiah tells us how not to fast on the Sabbath and also how to fast. I am going to put the following into my own words:


Faux Translation: Isaiah 58: 3-7
3 You keep asking me: Why have we fasted and You recognize us not? Why have we afflicted our souls, and You give no acknowledgment? I will tell you why. On the day of your fast you seek your own desires and you work your employees to death.
4 When you fast, you whine and argue and pound your fist. Do not fast as you have been doing in order to have your whiny voice heard by everyone.
5 Is this the kind of fast day I have chosen? – Is it supposed to be a day for man to be miserable? Is it supposed to be a day wherein a man wearing sackcloth bows down like a limp plant upon ashes? Is this an acceptable fast to the Lord?
6 By contrast, is not THIS the fast day I have chosen? -- It is a day to break the bands of wickedness, and to undo the heavy yokes, and to let the oppressed go free.
7 It is a day to give bread to the hungry, and to bring the homeless poor into the house. It is a day to put clothes on the naked. It is NOT a day to hide yourself from your brothers and sisters.

Isaiah ends these thoughts this way:


New American Standard Bible: Isaiah 58: 10-11
10 And if you give yourself to the hungry
And satisfy the desire of the afflicted,
Then your light will rise in darkness
And your gloom will become like midday.
11 And the LORD will continually guide you,
And satisfy your desire in scorched places,
And give strength to your bones;
And you will be like a watered garden,
And like a spring of water whose waters do not fail.

No wonder then that Jesus poked fun at the Pharisees, who believed they were extremely righteous and religious. The Pharisees were a sect of Judaism that came to symbolize religious arrogance, outward appearances, extreme formality, and the letter of the law without the spirit. The following is a parable of Jesus that illustrates these characteristics. The parable is called “The Pharisee and the Publican (tax collector).”


Luke 18: 10-14
10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men [are], extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.
12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as [his] eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified [rather] than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

In the public eye, Pharisees were highly respected for their adherence to the laws of God, but publicans (tax collectors) were highly despised. Those who listened to Jesus tell the parable above would have been surprised at the reversal of roles described in verse 14 -- for it was the publican who was to be exalted, not the Pharisee.


*****

Chapter 5 in Alma is noted for asking over 40 questions. One of the most important is found in verse 27: “Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time, within yourselves, that ye have been sufficiently humble?” The answer would be “Yes,” if, as indicated in verse 26, we “have experienced a change of heart” and “felt to sing the song of redeeming love.”

In 2 Nephi, Chapter 31 we are provided with the definition of religious humility. It talks about how Jesus had to humble himself before the Father by being baptized (verses 6 and 7). It then follows with these words:


2 Nephi 31: 13, 20
13 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, I know that if ye shall follow the Son, with full purpose of heart, acting no hypocrisy and no deception before God, but with real intent, repenting of your sins, witnessing unto the Father that ye are willing to take upon you the name of Christ, by baptism--yea, by following your Lord and your Savior down into the water, according to his word, behold, then shall ye receive the Holy Ghost; yea, then cometh the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost; and then can ye speak with the tongue of angels, and shout praises unto the Holy One of Israel. …

20 Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life.

The words above define religious humility.

Humility, when mastered, involves the greatest of blessings – perhaps not material blessings, but those that lead to a meaningful and happy life. The scriptures say:


Proverbs 22:4

4 ¶ By humility [and] the fear of the LORD [are] riches, and honour, and life.

D&C 105:12

12 For behold, I have prepared a great endowment and blessing to be poured out upon them, inasmuch as they are faithful and continue in humility before me.

Within humility is the power of God.



*****


Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible®,
Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973,
1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. 
Used by permission.

Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Safer than a Known Way

President Thomas S. Monson has cited words from the following poem in multiple LDS Conference talks over the years. The origin of the poem is a little obscure, although it is widely quoted in religious settings. It was written in England (1908) by Minnie Louise Haskins in a self-published booklet of poems called “The Desert.” The little book was not widely distributed. Much later in 1938, an admirer of Haskin’s poem used some of it on a personal Christmas card sent to King George VI. He liked the poem so much that he quoted it in an inspirational Christmas speech to the British people in 1939, the beginning of World War II. The poem is now engraved at the entrance of his tomb. Because of it inauspicious beginnings, the poem has no official name, but often goes by the two names given below. Haskin apparently wrote the poem at the beginning of a new year, which provoked the metaphor of standing at the gate of the year.

“The Gate of the Year” or “God Knows”

I said to the man who stood at the gate of the year
'Give me a light that I may tread safely into the unknown.'

And he replied,
'Go into the darkness and put your hand into the hand of God
That shall be to you better than light and safer than a known way!'

So I went forth and finding the Hand of God
Trod gladly into the night
He led me towards the hills
And the breaking of day in the lone east.

So heart be still!
What need our human life to know
If God hath comprehension?

In all the dizzy strife of things
Both high and low,
God hideth his intention."



Notes:: Minnie Louise Haskins, in The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, 4th ed., ed. (1996), 328; also, “The Gate of the Year,” in J. D. Morrison, (Ed.), Masterpieces of Religious Verse (1948), 92; and Thomas S. Monson, “Never Alone,” Ensign, May 1991, 59.

[To react, please click on "Comment" below]


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Grace

“Grace” loosely means gift, and it is a concept that strongly relates to Christ's atonement.

The atonement endows three main powers – the 3 R’s: 1) resurrection, 2) redemption and 3) relief (“the enabling power”). Through Christ all people, good and bad, will be resurrected to differing glories, which we divide into Celestial, Terrestial, or Telestial. “Redemption” refers to the power to remove sin as we repent through baptism and taking the sacrament. “Relief,” or the “enabling power,” allows imperfect but faithful people to be able to improve their lives, build Zion, and eventually become exalted. (See Bible Dictionary: “Grace;” and Ensign, Nov. 2004, p. 76). Grace encapsulates all three “R’s,” but it is mostly used as a substitute term for the enabling power. We do not talk much of the relieving or enabling power, but it is an essential concept.

The enabling power is the source of strength we derive from Christ that allows us to perform good and great works that we would ordinarily NOT be able to do relying solely upon ourselves. When Christ talked of the faith to move mountains, he was referring to the enabling power (see Matthew 17:20; 1 Corinthians 13:2; Jacob 4:6).

Elder David A. Bednar said, “In my personal scripture study I often insert the term enabling power whenever I encounter the word grace” (“In the strength of the Lord,” BYU Speeches, Oct. 23, 2001; cf. Ensign, Nov. 2004, p. 76). Is it not interesting that he gave this talk right after Sept. 11 when all of us felt very weak and needed the enabling power in our lives, more than ever?

Below, I have inserted “enabling power” for grace. [All bolding is mine].


revised John 1:17
17 For the law was given by Moses, but the enabling power and truth came by Jesus Christ.

revised Romans 3:23-24
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24 Being justified freely by his enabling power

revised Romans 5:1-2
1 ¶ THEREFORE being justified by faith, we have inner peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
2 By whom also we have access by faith into this enabling power wherein we now stand… .

revised Romans 6:14
14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law of Moses, but under the enabling power of Christ.

revised 2 Corinthians 12:9
9 And he [Jesus] said unto me, “My enabling power is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness.” Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

revised Ephesians 2:8
8 For by the enabling power are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

revised Ephesians 3:7-8
7 Whereof I [Paul] was made a minister, according to the gift of the enabling power of God ….
8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this enabling power given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ;

revised Titus 3:7
7 That being justified by his enabling power, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

revised 2 Nephi 2:8
8 Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and enabling power of the Holy Messiah … .

revised 2 Nephi 10:24
24 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, reconcile yourselves to the will of God … and remember, after ye are reconciled unto God, that it is only in and through the enabling power of God that ye are saved.

revised 2 Nephi 25:23
23 For we labor diligently … to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by the enabling power that we are saved, after all we can do.

revised Jacob 4:7
7 Nevertheless, the Lord God showeth us our weakness that we may know that it is by his enabling power… that we can do these things.

revised Ether 12:27
27 … I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my enabling power is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them.

revised Moroni 10:32
32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his enabling power sufficient for you, that by his enabling power ye may be perfect in Christ … .

Grace is that gift that enables us despite our sins to follow Christ. Without it, we are nothing. With it, we have inner peace, being confident in Christ and his saving atonement. Remember the 1st Principles: faith in Christ, repentance [redemption], cleansing ordinances [baptism, sacrament, and Temple], and gifts [enabling power & Holy Ghost].



[To react, please click on "Comment" below]

*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Sunday, February 17, 2008

By the Rivers of Babylon

The Book of Mormon is remarkable because it fits so well into the history of Israel.

In 600 B.C. Lehi preached repentance to the Jews and others in Jerusalem, foretelling that the city would be destroyed if they did not. Lehi, dissatisfied with what he saw, took his family and a few others to the Americas. Then, Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon (Iraq) in 597 B.C. invaded the kingdom of Judah and forced Jerusalem to surrender. He also exiled many Jews to Mesopotamia (still another term for Iraq). Then, he laid siege again in 586 B.C., and this time he destroyed Jerusalem and Solomon’s temple. Again, thousands of Jews were exiled to Babylon or Mesopotamia. This Babylonian exile lasted for decades until King Cyrus of Persia set the Jews free. Even so, the exile had lasting effects. Most Jews remained outside of Israel, even until the time of Christ. (In modern times, very few Jews can be found in Iraq).

Nebuchadnezzar tortured people during the exile period. The deep sorrow of the Jews in exile was captured in Psalms 137.

A little background before quoting the Psalm 137 verbatim: The setting of the psalm takes place on the Euphrates River, which flows near Babylon. The Babylonian captors had asked some of the Jews to take their harps and sing them some songs while the captors lounged along the river. The Jews refused and instead hung up their harps in the willow trees. Then, in the last verse the Jews issued a unique epithet to make sure the Babylonians got the point.

Although the Psalm (song) is about the captive Jews who refuse to sing, it is also about longing for Jerusalem. American Jews have been touched by this Psalm so much that they have moved to war-torn Israel. (As you read Psalm 137, remember “Yahweh” is just an alternate spelling for Jehovah).



Psalm 137 [from the:World English Bible]
1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down. Yes, we wept, when we remembered Zion.
2 On the willows in its midst, we hung up our harps.
3 For there, those who led us captive asked us for songs. Those who tormented us demanded songs of joy: "Sing us one of the songs of Zion!"
4 How can we sing Yahweh's song in a foreign land?
5 If I forget you, Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill.
6 Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I don't remember you; if I don't prefer Jerusalem above my chief joy.
7 Remember, Yahweh, against the children of Edom, the day of Jerusalem; who said, "Raze it! Raze it even to its foundation!"
8 Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction, he will be happy who rewards you, as you have served us.
9 Happy shall he be, who takes and dashes your little ones against the rock.


Verse 9 is often omitted in readings because it offends our modern sensibilities, but really it was just the Jews way of saying to the Babylonians: “Take your culture and shove it!”

Now you are in a better position to understand the following story told by U.S. Army Chaplain John Morris, who served in Iraq:



NPR: “Speaking of Faith,” An interview of Chaplain Major John Morris by Krista Tippett (rebroadcast May 24, 2007; originally broadcast in 2006)
Tippett: What is interesting about our chaplain corps is that it is profoundly interfaith in the sense that not only are there chaplains from many traditions, but that you minister as someone ordained in the United Methodist Church to whoever is there.

Morris: I do minister to whoever comes, and try not to abuse my office in getting them to believe what I believe. And, then I work hard to ensure that soldier has what they need to worship in the way that they believe they need to worship.

I will give you a great example. We learned that a Rabbi would be in Iraq for Passover, and Rabbis are in short supply in the Army. So, I found four Jewish personnel, two Marines and two Army, way out in the Anbar province [many miles west of Bagdad]. I said, “I will get you on a convoy and accompany you and get you into Passover, which is being held in the CPA [Coalition Provisional Authority] palace, now the embassy.” And, I had one of the most moving experiences of my life sitting in Saddam’s palace sharing with these Jews, who in their case were not really well versed in their own history. I said, “Hey, look guys, you’ve come full circle. Your people were here for thousands of years, and they endured so much. And, you’re back!!! And, you are sitting in the palace of a man who has personally persecuted your people. And, when the Psalmist said, ‘Sing to us the songs of Zion by the river,’ this is where it was at [see Psalms 137]. You’re back, and look around; the room is filled with 400 of your compatriots [Jews].” And, we had all the coalition partners represented by Jewish personnel in the CPA: civilian contractors and all the branches of the military.

I sat through the whole service, three and a half hours, and walked out of there feeling like I had touched the hem of God here. I have been in something so movingly spiritual that I really can’t capture it in words. And, when it was all said and done, one of the young soldiers said, “You know Sir, I never thought a Christian would do this for me.

Tippett: In a Muslim country…

Morris: God has a sense of humor. On that day he had a great laugh.


*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The End of Revelations

How might LDS missionaries explain Revelations 22: 18-19? The words from those verses are given below:



Revelations 22: 18-19
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.


The basic LDS interpretation is that the Apostle John was warning others not to tamper with the words of his own book, but he never meant to imply that God has stopped talking to his children through his prophets. There was no New Testament at the time John wrote Revelations around 100 A.D.

Tampering with written documents was a common problem in those ancient days in which there were no copyright laws. So, ancient authors often wrote words like the following:



Deuteronomy 4:2
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.


Proverbs 30:5-6
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.


Of course, such words of warning did not apply to future prophets who were authorized by priesthood to receive revelation.


*****

To really understand Revelations 22: 18-19 we need a good historical grounding. We need to understand a little bit about how the books of the New Testament were put together. This will allow us to teach the concepts with conviction.

First of all, we need to remember that the books of the New Testament were not arranged in a strict chronological order. The authors did not date their writings, and thus scholars have had to make educated guesses about a range of possible dates for each book

List #1, below, gives books from the New Testament, and it gives the probable dates of composition and the probable order written. I obtained the following from www.earlychristianwritings.com, a very reliable source:



List #1: Books of the New Testament, the approximate order in which they were written, and the approximate dates

50-60: 1 Thessalonians
50-60: Philippians
50-60: Galatians
50-60: 1 Corinthians
50-60: 2 Corinthians
50-60: Romans
50-60: Philemon
50-80: Colossians
50-95: Book of Hebrews
65-80: Gospel of Mark
70-100: Epistle of James
80-100: 2 Thessalonians
80-100: Ephesians
80-100: Gospel of Matthew
80-110: 1 Peter
80-130: Gospel of Luke
80-130: Acts of the Apostles
90-95: Apocalypse of John (Revelations)
90-120: Gospel of John
90-120: 1 John
90-120: 2 John
90-120: 3 John
90-120: Epistle of Jude
100-150: 1 Timothy
100-150: 2 Timothy
100-150: Titus
100-160: 2 Peter


First, notice from List #1 that it is not likely that the Book of Revelations was the last book written in the now accepted New Testament. Further, it is certainly true that the authors of these books were NOT aware of all the other books. For example, John (author of Revelations) probably knew only a few of the earlier books, and he certainly did not have a compilation of these books in front of him. Remember, many of these “books” were really letters written to specific groups of Christians, and these letters were not widely circulated at the time of John.

A word of caution is in order. The dates of List #1 are from scholars and they are NOT precise. For example, the late dates given to First and Second Peter are because scholars have had a hard time imagining the uneducated Apostle Peter having actually written those erudite books. So, they think someone else toward the end of the first century wrote the books in the name of Peter. The upshot is that we just need to remember to take the dates in List #1 with a grain of salt.

Second, we need to remember that the New Testament as we now have it was organized several centuries after the deaths of Jesus and the original Apostles. Although books of the New Testament were written in the 1st century, they were not compiled into a single book until much later.

In the 1st and 2nd centuries many manuscripts were floating around that claimed to be written by Apostles or Disciples of Christ. List #2 gives just a partial listing of such books.



List #2: A sample of books with the potential to be considered as scripture

50-90: Signs Gospel
50-120: Didache
50-140: Gospel of Thomas
50-200: Sophia of Jesus Christ
70-120: Egerton Gospel
70-160: Gospel of Peter
70-160: Secret Mark
70-200: Fayyum Fragment
70-200: Testaments of the 12 Patriarchs
100-150: Apocalypse of Peter
100-150: Secret Book of James
100-150: Preaching of Peter
100-160: Gospel of the Ebionites
100-160: Gospel of the Nazoreans
100-160: Shepherd of Hermas
73-200: Mara Bar Serapion
80-120: Epistle of Barnabas
80-140: 1 Clement
80-150: Gospel of the Egyptians
80-150: Gospel of the Hebrews
80-250: Christian Sibyllines
100-200: Odes of Solomon
101-220: Book of Elchasai
105-115: Ignatius of Antioch
110-140: Polycarp to the Philippians
110-140: Papias
110-160: Traditions of Matthias
111-112: Pliny the Younger
120-180: Apocryphon of John
120-180: Gospel of Mary
120-180: Dialogue of the Savior
120-180: Gospel of the Savior


Early Christians had a problem. Which of all the available books should be considered authentic, authoritative, and canonical? There are 27 books in our modern-day New Testament, but this number is partially a circumstance of history. There could have been more or less, depending upon the decisions made by various Christian counsels, primarily in the 4th century.



Differing authorities and differing counsels decided on different numbers of books, mostly from List #1. Clement of Rome (an early Church father around 95 A.D.) referred to 8 books or more from the New Testament. Ignatius of Antioch (around 115 A.D.) referred to 7 books, Polycarp (around 108 A.D.) referred to 15, Irenaeus (around 185 A.D.) referred to 21, and Hippolytus (around 200 A.D.) referred to 22 books.



The so-called Muratorian Fragment (circa 170 A.D.) is the oldest known list of books in the New Testament (see Ludovico Antonio Muratori, ed., Antiquitates Italicae Medii Aevi, v. 3, 1740). It indicated what books were being read in the Christian church at the time. It included all the current books in the New Testament, except Hebrews, James, and one of the letters of John. Interestingly, it included the Shepherd of Hermas (see List #2), although it admitted that Hermas was not of the same status as the Prophets (Old Testament) and the Apostles.



It was not until the Catholic Council of Laodicea (363 A.D.) that we began to see full acceptance of the 27 books of the now New Testament. The Councils of Hippo (393 A.D.) and Carthage (397 A.D.) reaffirmed this list.


*****

As you may know, Latter-day Saints (Mormons) accept the 27 books of the New Testament as scripture. We believe, like other churches, that God directed the formation of the book. However, we also recognize that natural processes were involved. Men make mistakes. For example, we realize that important inspired works could have been left out. This does not mean that we should start studying the books on List #2, but it means that we do NOT believe the canon is closed. God is always ready to reveal himself, depending upon us.

So, why do the Protestants consider the canon to be closed? When the Protestants, beginning with Martin Luther, broke off from the Catholic church in the Middle Ages, they knew that they could no longer claim a priesthood lineage that went through the Apostle Peter, the president of the original Apostles. Therefore, they had to claim the Bible as their sole authority. Without priesthood ordinances, they had to claim salvation by grace.

Protestant Christianity is based on the “Five Solas:”

1. Sola Scriptura (means “by scripture alone”) – the Bible is the ONLY inspired Word of God.
2. Sola Gratia (means “by grace alone”) – salvation is unearned, and that man cannot by any works of his own cooperate with the powers of grace.
3. Sola Fide (means “by faith alone”) – true faith yields redemption and good works. Good works are a product of faith, and not a necessary initial ingredient.
4. Solus Christus (means “by Christ alone”) – Christ is the only source of salvation, and there are no ordinances of salvation or absolution.
5. Soli Deo Gloria (meaning “glory to God alone”) – All glory belongs to God, not prophets, popes or kings.

The LDS response to the Five Solas would be something like:

1. Although the Bible is scripture and essential, it is not the full gospel. The Bible nowhere teaches that the heavens are closed or that there is no longer any need for authorized prophets.
2. Salvation is indeed by grace, but the purpose of the Church is to improve men and women to be exalted and to be like our Father-in-Heaven. Good works matter because we are trying (with God’s help) to follow the example of Jesus and to improve our lives.
3. Mormons believe that true faith is expressed through good works. Mere faith is the first essential step. (Mormons do NOT downplay the power of faith).
4. Mormons believe that every knee shall bow to Christ. He is the truth and the way. We express our faith in Christ by participating in saving ordinances, which are necessary because they are commanded.
5. All glory does belong to God, not men. We do thank God for our prophets, but we do not regard prophets as infallible or as demigods.


*****

Scriptures are never produced by magic. It is hard work for prophets to write scripture. Perhaps such writing is the hardest work that can be done.

Joseph Smith described the process by which he produced the Book of Mormon as “translation.” Yet, Joseph never knew any foreign languages. In a literal sense, he could translate nothing. Yet, the mechanism by which he produced the Book of Mormon involved extreme effort plus inspiration. The closest word to describe the work he was doing was “translate.”

All of our LDS scriptures are extremely valuable, but they are NOT perfect – because men were involved in their production. The Bible is NOT perfect, for example. I could write a whole essay on its imperfections. And yet, any imperfections are rather minor in the big scheme of things. This principle holds true for all scripture, which is given for the benefit and inspiration of man.

The Apostle John knew these principles, and therefore he wrote in effect: “Do not tamper with my work.” His warning was not perfectly heeded.



*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Apostasy from Apostolic Authority

Is there anything man can break that God cannot put back together? The whole history of the Israelites is one of a continuing cycle of God-given covenants being broken, followed by prophetic warnings, repentance, and new covenants to replace or fulfill the old. Adam & Eve were thrown out of the Garden with the possibility of renewal. The flood of Noah destroyed the wicked, but the earth was given a chance for renewal. Jesus as Messiah fulfilled the old covenant, the Law of Moses, and gave a new covenant that included a new Church organization based in the Melchizedek priesthood. His infinite atonement brought forth resurrection for all, redemption of sin, and the promise of his continuing spiritual presence (his enabling power). Although the atonement of Christ was infinite and final, His gospel principles and its associated priesthood had to be carried by mortal instruments, men who could die. Indeed, apostasy had set in during the lifetimes of the original Apostles, and then they died in rapid succession with little opportunity to reconstitute the Quorum.

Even the great scientist and theologian Isaac Newton (1733) foresaw the falling away (apostasy) and the need for a restoration:


"For the prophets and apostles have foretold that as Israel often revolted and brake the covenant and upon repentance renewed it, so there should be a falling away among the Christians, soon after the days of the Apostles, and that in the latter days God would … make a new covenant with his people." [Sir Issac Newton (1733). Observations on the prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John (part 1, Chapter 1, last paragraphs)]


The New Testament scripture is clear on these points. A “falling away” and “a restitution of all things” will precede the second coming of Christ.


2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
1 ¶ NOW we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and [by] our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 ¶ Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

Acts 3:19-21
19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord;
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.


The Apostle Paul’s writings indicated that the primitive Church had a rough beginning. He said the following to the Galatian Church:


Galatians 1:6-8
6 ¶ I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.


Clearly, doctrines were being perverted, and it was the Apostles who were charged with maintaining the integrity of the Church.

Paul, elsewhere, described how the Church will be attacked from the outside (v.29) and from the inside (v. 30):


Acts 20:29-30
29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.


Peter described the development of heresies and false teachers in the Church. They had and will have such success that truth will be seen as evil:


2 Peter 2:1-2
1 ¶ BUT there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.


All of these things will appear to be amplified in the last days, according to Paul:


2 Timothy 3:1-5
1 ¶ THIS know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.


Jesus foretold all of these events:


Matthew 24:4-6
4 ¶ And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all [these things] must come to pass, but the end is not yet.


The Apostle John foresaw in the last days an angel who would bring the everlasting gospel to all the earth. Based on the previous passages, no wonder it took an angel to help straighten things out.


Revelation 14:6-7
6 ¶ And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,
7 Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.


*****The Ordination and Order of the Church*****

Under the Law of Moses the Levitical or Aaronic priesthood was the primary source of authority for organizing the House of Israel and for the performance of its ordinances. Under the new covenant, a higher priesthood authority would become the primary source of authority.


Hebrews 7:11-12
11 ¶ If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.


Jesus ordained his twelve disciples as Apostles after the order of Melchizedek.


Mark 3:14-19
14 And he ordained twelve, that they should be with him, and that he might send them forth to preach,
15 And to have power to heal sicknesses, and to cast out devils:
16 And Simon he surnamed Peter;
17 And James the [son] of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and he surnamed them Boanerges, which is, The sons of thunder:
18 And Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the [son] of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Canaanite,
19 And Judas Iscariot, which also betrayed him … .


It is fascinating that almost all modern Christian religious organizations see the Apostleship as a defunct office or obsolete. They seem to have lost track of the fact that the Twelve Apostles represented the Twelve tribes of Israel. A primary job of the Twelve was to spread the gospel to the world and reorganize the scattered tribes of Israel in fulfillment of the Abrahamic covenant. Why would the office of Apostle become obsolete if its basic mission and charge were unfinished?

One thing is certain. The original Apostles (save John) died within 70 years after the death & resurrection of Jesus. Although attempts were made to fill vacancies of the Twelve, the Apostles were systematically exterminated faster than they could be replaced.

Below is a rough history of the martyrdom of the original Apostles and three of their replacements or additions. The history is rough because it is based mostly in traditions that could be (and probably are) greatly flawed. The main message, however, is not flawed. Their apostolic leadership did not last much more than 70 years. Although the remaining Church was almost always good intentioned, without apostolic priesthood authority, the Church spiraled further into apostasy.



*****The End of the Quorum Presidency of the Primitive Church*****

Peter: was the new name given by Jesus to Simon Bar-Jonah*, who was the brother of the Apostle Andrew. Other names included: Simon Peter, Cephas (Aramaic for stone), and Petros (Greek for pebble). He was the senior Apostle and first presiding officer of the primitive Church after the death and resurrection of Jesus. The Roman Emperor Nero ordered him crucified (which by tradition took place upside down). The LDS Bible Dictionary (LDS B.D.) says his death took place “perhaps in 64 or 65” A.D. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism (Vol.2, JOHN THE BELOVED) gives the date as 67 A.D.

The death of Jesus was sometime near 30 A.D. (plus or minus). This means that in 35- 40 years the primitive Church had lost its presiding leader. There is no evidence that the remaining Apostles reconstituted to appoint a successor. If one examines the death dates of the remaining Apostles, one gets the sense that the intensity of persecution simply never allowed a reconstitution.

James Bar-Zebedee: was the brother of the Apostle John (e.g., Matthew 4:21). James the greater functioned as the rough equivalent of a Counselor in the Presidency” to Peter. Scholars often refer to him as “James the greater” to distinguish him from the other Apostle James (“the lesser”) who was junior in seniority. By tradition only, his mother, Salome, was a sister to blessed mother Mary. James death is described in Acts 12:2, documenting his death by sword as ordered by Herod Agrippa I. This means that he probably was beheaded in Jerusalem. The date of his death is usually placed at 44 A.D.

John Bar-Zebedee: was the brother of James the greater. John functioned as the rough equivalent of a Counselor in the Presidency” to Peter. He is the traditional author of the Gospel of John, three Epistles, and Revelations. By tradition only, his mother, Salome, was a sister to blessed mother Mary. He is also known as “John the beloved” because he refers to himself as the disciple “whom Jesus loved” (e.g., John 13: 23). He is called “John, my beloved” by Christ in the Book of Mormon (3 Nephi 28:6). He was exiled (about 90 A.D) to the Isle of Patmos by the Emperor Domitian. At that time he may have written the Book of Revelations. LDS doctrine indicates that John did not die but was translated to continue the Lord’s work until his second coming (D&C Sec. 7). Restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood in 1829 involved Peter and James, as resurrected beings, and John as a translated being (physical but not subject to death).



*****The End of Other Members of the Original Twelve*****

Andrew Bar-Jonah: was the brother of Simon Peter. Little is known about him. Tradition has him crucified on an X-shaped cross during the reign of Emperor Nero between 60 – 68 A.D.

Philip: Tradition says that he was crucified at Heliopolis, Phrygia (Turkey) sometime between 52 – 80 A.D.

Bartholomew: means son of Tolmai. He may have also been called Nathanael. He is said to have been flayed and crucified at Albanopolis, Armenia about 52 A.D., but this date is more uncertain than others.

Matthew Bar-Alphaeus: was probably the author of the Gospel of Matthew. His alternate name, Levi, may have been an indication of his priestly lineage. He was a publican (tax collector). He is a possible brother to James Bar-Alphaeus and Jude. Various traditions have him martyred in India, Ethiopia, or Asia about 60 A.D.

Thomas: also went by Didymus. A current nickname for him is “Doubting Thomas,” as he doubted the resurrection of Jesus until he could touch the wounds in his hands. Various traditions have him crucified or pierced in anywhere from Egypt to India. Death dates range from 72 – 76 A.D.

James Bar-Alphaeus: is called by scholars “James the less” (taken from Mark 15: 40) to distinguish him from James Bar-Zebedee. He was the brother of Jude (Luke 6: 16; Jude 1:1). He may have been a brother to Matthew (having the same last name). Matthew 27: 56 (cf. Mark 15: 40) indicates that his mother was named Mary, and that she was distinct from the “mother of Zebedee’s children,” that is, the mother of James the greater and John. Because John 19: 25 says that the blessed Mother Mary had a sister also named “Mary” (here: Mary II), the wife of Cleophas, scholarly speculations have run amuck. Some say Mary II was a sister or a sister-in-law. Some have proposed Mary II was the mother of James the less, straining the equivalence between Cleophas and Alphaeus. Catholic tradition has turned him into “the brother of Jesus,” or James the Just (see below), insisting that the virgin Mary would not have had additional children besides Jesus. Because tradition thoroughly has confused the different James’s, attaching a particular date and place of death is tenuous at best. However, the most commonly used date is about 60 – 62 A.D.

Thaddaeus: has a wide variety of names, including, Jude, Jude Thaddaeus, Lebbeus Thaddaeus, and Judas the brother of James (Luke 6:16). He was the brother of James Bar-Alphaeus (Jude 1:1). Presumably, he had the same mother and father as James. Tradition claims he was killed in Persia or East India about 52 A.D.

Simon the Canaanite: The name as given in Mark 3:18 and Matthew 10: 4 is a complete mistranslation of the King James Bible (See LDS B.D. under “Canaanite” and “Zelotes”). The KJV translators presumed that the Aramaic word Cananaean or Kananite (Strong’s #2581) referred to a land of origin, such as Canaan, but they were wrong. A Kananite is a zealot, someone with zeal for the Jewish law and an activist against the Roman Empire. Better alternate names include: Simon Zelotes or Simon the Zealot. Little is known about him. Traditions have him martyred in Britain, Samaria, Persia, and Iberia. He was said to have been crucified in 74 A.D.

Judas Iscariot: is the great traitor of the Bible, having betrayed Jesus in Gethsemane. His death is described as “falling headlong” (Acts 1: 18-19) or suicide by hanging (Matthew 27: 3-10) some short time after the crucifixion of Jesus.



*****The End of the Lives of Other Known Apostles*****

Matthias: The case of Matthias is critical because it shows that the primitive Church had full intention of keeping the Quorum of Twelve Apostles operational. When Judas Iscariot died, there was a vacancy to be filled. Read carefully the following:


Acts 1:21-26
21 Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,
22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
23 And they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.
24 And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all [men], shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
26 And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.


The remaining Apostles clearly were seeking someone with long-term experience in the Church, and who could testify of the resurrection. Various traditional accounts have him being stoned anywhere between Ethiopia to Colchis from 70 to 80 A.D.

James “the Just”: was the brother of Christ and was designated an Apostle (see. e..g., Galatians 1: 19; and 1 Cor. 15: 7 is a probable reference to him). It is not known when he entered the Quorum, although the Encyclopedia of Mormonism (Vol. 1, “Apostle”) claims he was a member by 54 A.D.

There is no clear-cut objective way to determine how many people named James there were among the early Apostles. There could have been two, three, or four distinct individuals (see LDS B.D.: “James”). Part of the problem is that when James Bar-Zebedee (of “Peter, James, and John” fame) died in Acts 12:2, another person named James immediately took considerable prominence in the leadership. In Acts 12:17 one reads, “Go shew these things unto James, and to the brethren.” Acts 21:18 says, “Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present.” Whoever this James was, he was central.

Another unsolved problem is related to the names of the brothers of Jesus. Matthew 13:55 says, “is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?” Well, we know that James Bar-Alphaeus also had brothers named Judas and Joses and a mother named Mary (e.g., Mark 15: 40). This seems to be more than coincidence, but Joseph not Alphaeus was husband of the blessed mother Mary.

Many possible solutions to the “James-problem” exist, but the best solution seems to be to take the scriptures literally. When Paul says (Galatians 1: 19) that he saw “James the Lord's brother” he meant brother, not cousin, not brother in the gospel or some other permutation.

To James “the Just” the following tradition is best ascribed: His enemies among the Jews tossed him to the ground from the top of the Jerusalem temple. He survived the fall! However, he was stoned and clubbed to death. This may have happened in 60 A.D.

Paul: was also known as Saul prior to his Christian conversion. As a Jew he consented to and witnessed the stoning of Stephen, the first Christian martyr after Christ (Acts 7: 58; 22:20). Shortly after, on the road to Damascus, he had a profound conversion (Acts 9). This may have been the year 34 or 35 A.D. Many years later he became an Apostle. His ordination was not recorded, but it may have been when he was set apart to serve his first missionary journey with Barnabas (Acts 13; see also Gal. 2: 9). It appears to be at this time that his name Saul was changed to the new name of Paul. This would make his apostolic ordination at least 13 years after his conversion (see LDS B.D.: “Paul”). Tradition says that Paul was beheaded by sword on the orders of Nero in about 65 A.D.



*****Conclusions*****

Jesus brought a new covenant and reactivated the Melchizedek priesthood to subsume the Levitical priesthood. He called Twelve Apostles to organize Churches across the world. He ordained them to the Melchizedek priesthood. There were clear lines of authority with Peter, James, and John taking the primary roles of leadership after the death of Jesus. It would appear that the Twelve were systematically stalked and murdered. Our Christian heritage was bought with the blood of many Christian martyrs.

The Church endured with some semblance of Apostolic control for about 50 to 70 years. Even during those years the epistles of the Apostles expressed great concern that the purities of the gospel were being polluted.

Attempts were made to replace Apostles after their deaths, but deaths came frequent. Church conferences were held on occasion in Jerusalem, but travel was primitive. After the deaths of the Apostles considerable deviations in practice took place.

There was a great falling away, which necessitated a restitution, as was all foretold.



*****


Copyright 2008 S.Faux (Email: foxgoku54 [at] gmail [d0t] com; URL: http://mormoninsights.blogspot.com). Readers may distribute this post for noncommercial purposes provided such distributing is of the entire post, including author's copyright and contact information. All other rights reserved.


Blogged.com Blog Directory


Please feel free to give my blog site a "Blogged.com" rating and review by clicking here.

*****